Related%20passage for Eruvin 138:10
<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> אנשי חצר ששכח אחד מהן ולא עירב ביתו אסור מלהכניס ומלהוציא לו ולהם ושלהם מותרין לו ולהם נתנו לו רשותן הוא מותר והן אסורין
and if he is a mumar in respect of one precept only, does not a contradiction arise from the middle clause?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which does allow sacrifices to be accepted from a person who is a mumar in respect of one precept only.');"><sup>23</sup></span> Must it not consequently be conceded that it is this that was meant:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the final clause.');"><sup>24</sup></span> Except from one who is a mumar in respect of offering libations of wine to idols or the desecration of the Sabbath in public?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of course it must.');"><sup>25</sup></span>
Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 138:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.